How Much Dough Goes in a Detroit-Style Pizza Pan? I Measured 10 Recipes

Share this recipe

Detroit-style pizza is defined by its pan, so the one number that decides how it comes out is how much dough goes into that pan. Almost nobody states it. Recipes give you a dough weight and a pan size separately, and leave you to work out whether yours is thick or thin.

I took 10 data points from 8 published sources, converted everything to grams of dough per square centimetre of pan, and put them side by side. The spread is about 38% from the thinnest to the thickest.

Ten recipes, one number

Pan areas used throughout: 8 x 10 inch is 516 cm², 10 x 14 inch is 903 cm². Where a recipe gave no total dough weight I added the ingredients up, and those rows are marked derived rather than stated.

SourcePanDoughBasisg/cm²
Charlie Anderson8 x 10 in235 gstated0.455
Charlie Anderson10 x 14 in411 gstated0.455
Feeling Foodish (classic default)8 x 10 in236 gderived from coefficient0.457
Feeling Foodish (classic default)10 x 14 in413 gderived from coefficient0.457
Detroit Style Pizza Co.8 x 10 in283 gstated0.549
Alexandra’s Kitchen (yeast)10 x 14 in536 gstated0.593
Alexandra’s Kitchen (sourdough)10 x 14 in546 gstated0.605
PizzaLogic10 x 14 in546 gstated0.605
A Cozy Kitchen9 x 13 in473 gderived0.627
Detroit Style Pizza Co.10 x 14 in567 gstated0.628

The numbers

Range 0.455 to 0.628 g/cm². Median 0.566 g/cm². The mean sits at 0.553. Narrowing to only the 10 x 14 inch pans, which is the classic format, the median rises to 0.593.

The most interesting thing in the table is a convergence. Charlie Anderson gives full figures for two different pan sizes, and both work out to 2.94 grams per square inch. Feeling Foodish’s dough calculator uses 2.95 g per square inch as its stated default for a classic Detroit. One recipe author and one calculator, built separately, landing on the same coefficient to two decimal places.

Only one source treats it as a variable at all

Of the eight sources, exactly one, Feeling Foodish, names dough weight per unit of pan area as something you would deliberately tune, and offers a thin, classic and thick coefficient to pick from. Everybody else gives a single weight for a single pan and says nothing about what it would mean to change it.

That is a real gap. If you own a pan that is not one of the two standard sizes, most of these recipes give you nothing to scale with.

What is not settled

Nobody in this set tested thin against thick and reported which people preferred. “Thicker is more authentic” is well evidenced. “Thicker is better” is tested nowhere here.

The single best source for this question was a specialist pizza forum thread on exactly this variable, and it refused an automated read, so it is not in the data. Serious Eats is not in it either. Two of these ten rows are derived by adding ingredients up rather than taken from a stated total, and one source’s own page has an internal inconsistency between its per-pan weights and its stated yield, which I resolved in favour of the per-pan figures.

What I did with it

My own pizza dough calculator had a Detroit preset of 380 g in a 35 x 25 cm tin, which is 0.434 g/cm². That is below every actual recipe in the table. It is now 495 g, which puts it on the median of the ten. The old figure was flattered by a bug: the calculator was treating a rectangular tin as a circle, and the wrong arithmetic made a thin number look normal.

You might also like:

Enjoyed it? Share it

Made it? Tell me how it went

Tell me what you changed and how it turned out, or ask a question about the recipe. No email needed.

Scroll to Top